Image Credit: NY Press |
What is a developer to do? By all accounts this attractive slice of Village real estate (and history) should be fetching top dollar, but the onerous nature of the restrictions leave the empty building's future unclear and the property nearly inalienable. The only hope for those looking to free the property from the restrictive covenant would be to have the restrictions lifted because the covenant violates public policy interests with its wide scope and open-ended duration. See, e.g., Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (N.J. Super. 1994) (holding covenant prohibiting building being used as discount grocery store in an area with high concentration of elderly and low-income residents to be invalid for policy reasons). However, unlike in the Katz case, it would be a much more difficult argument to assert that the Dispensary should be allowed to be developed into luxury condos or a commercial building to meet the demands of well-heeled neighbors or speculators. While a few people would be served by this development, it seems unlikely that such practices would have such widespread benefits to the community to make the appeal able to stand on firm public policy grounds in the effort to terminate, or even modify, the covenants. For now, the Gottlieb Real estate is "examining all options" and the triangular building will sit on Waverly Place waiting, as it has for more than two decades, for its next chapter to begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment